Defense Minister’s statement on abuse welcomed, but 6 urgent actions needed to ensure survivors’ safety
On Sunday (12 April), Senior Minister (Security Cluster) Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob encouraged domestic…
Joint Action Group For Gender Equality (JAG) urges Judiciary to Clarify Judgement
Yesterday, the Court of Appeal unanimously decided to overturn a High Court decision sentencing national bowler, Noor Afizal Azizan to five years in jail for statutory rape. Instead, he is bound over for five years for good behaviour, for a sum of RM25, 000. In his judgment, Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Raus Md Shariff noted that “public interest would not be served if Noor Afizal was sent to jail as he had a bright future.”
While the Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG) acknowledges the lack of information on factors influencing the Appellate Court’s decision in sentencing, we are troubled that the perpetrator’s potential for “a bright future”, presumably derived from his status as a national athlete, was used as one of the grounds for sentencing. If this was the sole influencing factor in sentencing, then JAG expresses regret over the decision by the Court of Appeal that the perpetrator was released on probation of good conduct for the offence of statutory rape.
On the surface, the judgement appears to hint at the application of a double standard by implying that anyone with the right ‘credentials’ can commit a crime, and get away with a rap on the knuckles. Does it mean that an individual who is perceived to have no future would get a heavier sentence?
JAG respects and upholds the discretionary powers of the court in sentencing; we believe that the court has a duty to exercise its powers equitably so as to ensure that justice is applied equally to all strata of society.
We recognize the potential complexities involved in statutory rape cases. While statutory rape laws are put into place to protect children from abuse by older, predatory partners, teenagers in a sexual relationship can sometimes get caught in the crossfire.
We urge the judiciary to clarify in their judgement all of the factors that were taken into account for the sentencing. JAG hopes that although the victim may have ‘consented’ to sex, the effect of the crime on the victim (i.e. a child of 13 years) was also considered.
Press statement released by the Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG), which comprises:
Sisters In Islam (SIS)
Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO)
All Women’s Action Society (AWAM)
Women’s Centre for Change, Penang (WCC)
Perak Women for Women Society (PWW)
Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER)